GTX 1660 Super Bottleneck Calculator
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a Turing graphics card with 6 GB of VRAM, launched in 2019. Use this page as a bottleneck detector for the GTX 1660 Super: pick any processor and you get the bottleneck direction and percentage at 1080p, 1440p and 4K, estimated FPS in 14 games, and the best-value CPU matches. This page also covers the GTX 1660 Ti, which perform the same in games.
Check the GTX 1660 Super with your processor
Data version 2026.09 · methodologyGTX 1660 Super specs that matter for bottlenecks
| VRAM | 6 GB |
| Memory bus | 192-bit |
| Architecture | Turing |
| Board power | 125 W |
| Launched | 2019 |
| PCPartGuide index 1080p / 1440p / 4K | 24 / 19 / 13 (100 = RTX 5090) |
| Typical price | under $200 class |
For frame rate, the GTX 1660 Super's compute throughput sets its ceiling; VRAM decides whether that ceiling holds at high texture settings and resolutions.
Which CPUs bottleneck the GTX 1660 Super?
Typical modern AAA game, high settings, no upscaling, with a matching dual-channel RAM kit. A CPU percentage means the processor limits the pair; a GPU percentage means the graphics card does (the normal state). Rows with a link have a full page; the others run in the calculator above.
| Processor | 1080p | 1440p | 4K | fps 1440p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68% GPU | 84% GPU | 94% GPU | 42 | |
| 67% GPU | 83% GPU | 94% GPU | 42 | |
| 66% GPU | 83% GPU | 94% GPU | 42 | |
| 64% GPU | 82% GPU | 93% GPU | 42 | |
| 64% GPU | 82% GPU | 93% GPU | 42 | |
| 62% GPU | 81% GPU | 93% GPU | 42 | |
| 61% GPU | 80% GPU | 93% GPU | 42 | |
| 60% GPU | 80% GPU | 93% GPU | 42 | |
| 60% GPU | 80% GPU | 93% GPU | 42 | |
| 59% GPU | 80% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 59% GPU | 80% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 59% GPU | 80% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 58% GPU | 79% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 58% GPU | 79% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 58% GPU | 79% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 58% GPU | 79% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 57% GPU | 78% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 57% GPU | 78% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 57% GPU | 78% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 57% GPU | 78% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 57% GPU | 78% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 56% GPU | 78% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 56% GPU | 78% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 55% GPU | 77% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 56% GPU | 78% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 56% GPU | 78% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 55% GPU | 77% GPU | 92% GPU | 42 | |
| 53% GPU | 76% GPU | 91% GPU | 42 | |
| 54% GPU | 77% GPU | 91% GPU | 42 | |
| 54% GPU | 77% GPU | 91% GPU | 42 | |
| 54% GPU | 77% GPU | 91% GPU | 42 | |
| 52% GPU | 76% GPU | 91% GPU | 42 | |
| 52% GPU | 76% GPU | 91% GPU | 42 | |
| 52% GPU | 76% GPU | 91% GPU | 42 | |
| 51% GPU | 75% GPU | 91% GPU | 42 | |
| 49% GPU | 74% GPU | 91% GPU | 42 | |
| 49% GPU | 74% GPU | 91% GPU | 42 | |
| 47% GPU | 73% GPU | 90% GPU | 42 | |
| 46% GPU | 73% GPU | 90% GPU | 42 | |
| 48% GPU | 74% GPU | 90% GPU | 42 | |
| 48% GPU | 74% GPU | 90% GPU | 42 | |
| 45% GPU | 72% GPU | 90% GPU | 42 | |
| 44% GPU | 72% GPU | 90% GPU | 42 | |
| 43% GPU | 71% GPU | 89% GPU | 42 | |
| 43% GPU | 71% GPU | 89% GPU | 42 | |
| 42% GPU | 71% GPU | 89% GPU | 42 | |
| 42% GPU | 71% GPU | 89% GPU | 42 | |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | 41% GPU | 70% GPU | 89% GPU | 42 |
| 43% GPU | 71% GPU | 89% GPU | 42 | |
| 40% GPU | 70% GPU | 89% GPU | 42 | |
| 40% GPU | 70% GPU | 89% GPU | 42 | |
| 41% GPU | 70% GPU | 89% GPU | 42 | |
| 37% GPU | 68% GPU | 88% GPU | 42 | |
| 37% GPU | 68% GPU | 88% GPU | 42 | |
| 37% GPU | 68% GPU | 88% GPU | 42 | |
| 36% GPU | 68% GPU | 88% GPU | 42 | |
| 34% GPU | 67% GPU | 88% GPU | 42 | |
| 34% GPU | 67% GPU | 88% GPU | 42 | |
| 33% GPU | 66% GPU | 88% GPU | 42 | |
| 33% GPU | 66% GPU | 88% GPU | 42 | |
| 32% GPU | 66% GPU | 87% GPU | 42 | |
| 32% GPU | 66% GPU | 87% GPU | 42 | |
| 32% GPU | 66% GPU | 87% GPU | 42 | |
| 30% GPU | 65% GPU | 87% GPU | 42 | |
| 30% GPU | 65% GPU | 87% GPU | 42 | |
| 29% GPU | 64% GPU | 87% GPU | 42 | |
| Ryzen 5 3600 | 27% GPU | 63% GPU | 86% GPU | 42 |
| 26% GPU | 63% GPU | 86% GPU | 42 | |
| 22% GPU | 61% GPU | 85% GPU | 42 | |
| 20% GPU | 60% GPU | 85% GPU | 42 | |
| 16% GPU | 58% GPU | 84% GPU | 42 | |
| 16% GPU | 58% GPU | 84% GPU | 42 | |
| 16% GPU | 58% GPU | 84% GPU | 42 | |
| 16% GPU | 58% GPU | 84% GPU | 42 | |
| 12% GPU | 56% GPU | 84% GPU | 42 | |
| balanced | 54% GPU | 83% GPU | 42 | |
| balanced | 53% GPU | 83% GPU | 42 | |
| balanced | 52% GPU | 82% GPU | 42 | |
| balanced | 49% GPU | 81% GPU | 42 | |
| balanced | 47% GPU | 81% GPU | 42 |
Best CPUs for the GTX 1660 Super by resolution
| Resolution | Budget (under $300) | Mid-range ($300–600) | High-end ($600+) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1080p | Ryzen 5 2600 ~84 fps · balanced | no balanced option | no balanced option |
| 1440p | no balanced option | no balanced option | no balanced option |
| 4K | no balanced option | no balanced option | no balanced option |
Balanced at 1440p: none of the listed processors keep this card fully fed. Picks favour the most frames per dollar inside each price class; prices are typical street prices, not live quotes.
See GTX 1660 Super pricesAffiliate link: if you buy through it we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Estimated FPS with the GTX 1660 Super and a Ryzen 7 9800X3D
| Game | 1080p | 1440p | 4K | Limiter at 1080p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortnite (Performance mode) | 251 | 127 | 47 | GPU |
| Valorant | 452 | 229 | 85 | GPU |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 244 | 123 | 46 | GPU |
| Apex Legends | 139 | 70 | 26 | game cap |
| Call of Duty: Warzone | 90 | 46 | 17 | GPU |
| Marvel Rivals | 63 | 32 | 12 | GPU |
| Rainbow Six Siege | 264 | 134 | 49 | GPU |
| Minecraft (Java) | 487 | 246 | 91 | GPU |
| Roblox | 240 | 176 | 65 | game cap |
| GTA V | 118 | 60 | 22 | GPU |
| Rust | 70 | 35 | 13 | GPU |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 63 | 32 | 12 | GPU |
| Helldivers 2 | 63 | 32 | 12 | GPU |
| Elden Ring | 60 | 42 | 16 | game cap |
High settings, no upscaling, dual-channel RAM. Competitive titles are shown at their usual reduced settings. Estimates, not benchmarks: see the methodology.
Is 6 GB of VRAM enough?
6GB is tight even at 1080p in current AAA titles: keep textures at medium and avoid ray tracing on the GTX 1660 Super.
More in the VRAM bottleneck guide.
Signs the GTX 1660 Super is your bottleneck
A GTX 1660 Super bottleneck is the normal state: GPU usage sits at 97–100% and the frame rate scales directly with resolution and settings.
With 6GB of VRAM the GTX 1660 Super can hit a memory limit before it hits a compute limit at 1440p and above: sudden stutter and texture pop-in are the giveaway, not a low average.
The GTX 1660 Super predates modern upscaling quality and frame generation, so the usual "turn on DLSS/FSR" escape hatch is weaker here.
How to confirm it on your own PC: reading CPU and GPU usage correctly. Fixes: how to fix a GPU bottleneck.
Upgrade paths from the GTX 1660 Super
The next sensible step from the GTX 1660 Super is the RTX 2060 (about 26% more performance at 1440p); the RTX 2060 Super is the biggest jump worth considering in the same price class or one above.
- RTX 2060 — about 26% faster at 1440p, under $200 class.
- Arc A580 — about 21% faster at 1440p, under $200 class.
- RTX 2060 Super — about 42% faster at 1440p, $200–300 class.
Deciding between a processor and a graphics card? Read upgrade CPU or GPU first.
GTX 1660 Super bottleneck FAQ
What CPU do I need for the GTX 1660 Super?
The GTX 1660 Super is fast enough that only the quickest processors keep it fully fed at 1440p; at 4K almost any modern six-core CPU is enough.
Does the Ryzen 7 9800X3D bottleneck the GTX 1660 Super?
At 1080p the GTX 1660 Super is heavily GPU-bound (68%). The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has a lot of unused headroom, so a much faster graphics card would pay off without touching the processor. At 4K the GTX 1660 Super is heavily GPU-bound (94%). The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has a lot of unused headroom, so a much faster graphics card would pay off without touching the processor.
Is the GTX 1660 Super good for 4K?
Not at native high settings: about 16 fps at 4K in a typical modern AAA game. It is a 1080p or 1440p card, or a 4K card with upscaling and reduced settings.
Is 6 GB enough in 2026?
6GB is tight even at 1080p in current AAA titles: keep textures at medium and avoid ray tracing on the GTX 1660 Super.
Is the GTX 1660 Super worth upgrading to?
Coming from a GTX 1650 Super, the GTX 1660 Super is about 27% faster at 1440p in our index, which is the point where an upgrade is clearly felt. From anything within 20% of it, wait a generation.
Popular GTX 1660 Super pairings
Try the calculator with your exact parts
RAM kit, resolution, game and refresh rate all change the answer.